Beyond Books homepage

Hello, GUEST
Log in

BackLinksNext
Study Questions
Add to Portfolio
Merriam-Webster's CollegiateŽ Dictionary
Click to hide Teasers
What Sayeth You?
"I have composed a little work on principalities; there I plunge as deeply as I can into this subject, discussing what a principality is, what kinds there are, how they are acquired, how they are maintained, why they are lost." -Niccolo Machiavelli
Go to http://www.orst.edu/instruct/phl302/philosophers/machaivelli.html

Dost Thou Know?
In the Arthur Brooke poem that served as one of Shakespeare's sources for Romeo and Juliet, the Prince hands out some rather harsh sentences to those who helped the dead lovers. The Apothecary and the Nurse are among those who would have undoubtedly favored Shakespeare's version of the tale.
Go to http://www.clicknotes.com/romeo/brooke/B1527_1700.html

Search BB
Beyond Books Home Programs Your Desk Portfolios Help
Shakespeare
Romeo and Juliet: What's Going On?
Cite this page Printer-friendly page

5g. Prince Escalus

In the 1996 film version of Romeo and Juliet, Prince Escalus's role as Verona's keeper of the peace was interpreted literally; he was represented as a police officer.
Weighing decisions. Balancing sides. Choosing what's right. That's the job of a wise leader and Prince Escalus strives to be one.

The name, Escalus, literally means scale, an old symbol for justice. Throughout the play, Escalus tries to maintain order and strike a just balance. He attempts to rule wisely and within the prevailing guidelines for the time period.

Verona, the setting for Romeo and Juliet is a city-state in Italy during the Renaissance. As its ruler, Escalus has broad discretion about how to govern. Leaders of this time were frequently despots. Escalus is atypical of his era, as he continually strives to temper his judgments about the Montague-Capulet feud with compassion and parity.

The Prince first enters the scene after the brawl between members of the Capulet and Montague households on the street. The Prince's arrival stops the fighting and he is furious with everyone involved in the brawl. He calls them "rebellious subjects, enemies to peace" (1.1.80) and is particularly angered by the presence of the two older men, Montague and Capulet. Listen to his rage.

In this speech the audience learns that there is just cause for Escalus's anger. This street-fighting is not a one-time occurrence. Escalus reprimands Montague and Capulet that three times of late there have been peace-breaking brawls instigated by their households.

EscalusThree civil brawls, bred of an airy word,
By thee, old Capulet, and Montague,
Have thrice disturb'd the quiet of our streets,
(1.1.89-91)

He obviously holds them equally responsible and says that he will speak to each of them, privately, about the situation. What's his collateral for this bargain? Their lives. The Prince means business.

Prince Escalus's very name calls to mind his role as the representative of judgment and justice in Romeo and Juliet.
Has the Prince been too harsh in his decree? An understanding of Elizabethan law might provide some insight, but a consideration of the laws that would have governed an Italian city-state such as Verona is useful.

Prince Escalus is unlike most rulers of Renaissance city-states. The prevailing wisdom of the time called for dire and direct punishment of offenders against the state. In 1513, the great Italian statesman and writer Niccolo Machiavelli wrote a famous treatise called The Prince. In it, he provided guidelines for how a ruler should manage his subjects in order to stay in power. The Prince is not merely prescriptive for rulers of its time; the document reflects how successful leaders were governing. The information contained therein can be applied to Prince Escalus's governing of Verona.

According to Machiavelli's The Prince, the best way for a prince to maintain order is to rule well. If this is not possible, then Machiavelli presents a variety of strategies for remaining in power. Cruelty is definitely an option.

"The Prince must not mind incurring the charge of cruelty for the purpose of keeping his subjects united and faithful; for, with a very few examples, he will be more merciful than those who, from excess of tenderness, allow disorders to arise." -Niccolo Machiavelli, The Prince

In The Prince, Machiavelli describes the courses of action a ruler can take when confronted with persistent civil strife (such as the brawling that erupts on the streets of Verona). He lists what the Prince can do to maintain order in his principality and to retain his own power.

  1. the one is to put the leaders to death
  2. (the second) to banish them from the city
  3. (last, and certainly least) to reconcile them to each other under a pledge not to offend again
    -Niccolo Machiavelli, The Prince
In Romeo and Juliet, the Prince threatens to impose the first punishment — death — after the street brawl.

EscalusIf ever you disturb our streets again,
Your lives shall pay the forfeit of the peace.
(1.1.96-97)

Niccolo Machiavelli's The Prince is still widely considered by political theorists to be a masterpiece.
Though Escalus has threatened a death sentence, he does not impose it. The punishment he enforces is the third option: "to reconcile them to each other under a pledge." Presumably, in his individual discussions with Montague and Capulet, the Prince extracts their pledge to end the fighting. Capulet's gracious behavior toward Romeo and his refusal to have a brawl in his home suggest that he has taken the Prince's edict seriously and intends to uphold the pledge.

But the pledge doesn't last. Another brawl erupts only one day later. Tybalt (a Capulet) is killed and so is Romeo's good friend, Mercutio. Mercutio is not attached to either household — he is a relative of the Prince.

After the fray, Lady Capulet cries out for vengeance and demands that the Prince impose the death sentence that he had promised earlier.

Lady CapuletTybalt, my cousin!
O my brother's child!
O Prince! O cousin! Husband! O, the blood is spill'd
Of my dear kinsman! Prince as thou art true,
For blood of ours, shed blood of Montage.
(3.1.145-48)

But there's a catch. Though Romeo has slain Tybalt, Tybalt struck the first blow against Mercutio. The situation appears to leave Escalus in a quandary.

EscalusRomeo slew him, he slew Mercutio.
Who now the price of his dear blood doth owe?
(3.1.181-82)

Escalus decides to be lenient in his measure of justice. He does not execute Romeo; instead he selects the second option two from the Machiavellian scheme: "to banish them [the offenders] from the city." He insists that Romeo get out, fast, or face the death sentence. He warns that this is the last time he'll show mercy.

EscalusLet Romeo hence in haste,
Else, when he's found, that hour is his last.
(3.1.193-94)

Ultimately, Escalus doubts his own edict. He knows he should be tougher.

EscalusMercy but murders, pardoning those that kill.
(3.1.196)

Escalus's final appearance is at the tragic end of the story. There has been more bloodshed. This time, Juliet, Romeo, and Paris (another kinsman to the Prince) are all dead. In the final scene, Prince Escalus acts not only as ruler of Verona, but also as a kind of detective attempting to sort out all of the facts. He is both the police and the judge.

EscalusSeal up the mouth of outrage for a while,
Till we can clear these ambiguities,
And know their spring, their head, their true descent;
And then will I be general of your woes,
And lead you even to death.
Meantime, forbear,
And let mischance be slave to patience.
Bring forth the parties of suspicion.
(5.3.216-22)

He calmly listens to the testimony of Friar Lawrence, Romeo's servant Balthasar, and Paris's page. Then, in his role of the dispenser of justice to Verona, he makes his final proclamation.

EscalusGo hence to have more talk of these sad things.
Some shall be pardon'd, and some punished;
(5.3.307-08)

The Rotunda of St. Lawrence in Mantua suggests that the city was not the hell-on-earth that Romeo seems to consider it after Escalus banishes him from Verona.
Shakespeare's source material for the play, Arthur Brooke's poem, Romeus and Juliet details these punishments. But Shakespeare chooses to leave them out. He does not have Escalus metes out final judgments.

The play ends here. The audience never learns the final punishment. Perhaps Shakespeare felt that the tragic ending served the justice that Escalus needed to dispense. Not even a Machiavellian scheme of justice can exact a higher price from these offenders.



BackLinksNext
BACK | LINKS | NEXT

Talk to us!
Tell Beyond Books what you think of this page, ask us questions about our service, or report any problems. Students working on assignments should use Your Portfolios in Your Desk. Sorry, no homework help! Selected comments are shown on our User Comments page.
Your name:
Your e-mail:
Comments:
 

BEYOND BOOKS HOME ||| PROGRAMS ||| YOUR DESK ||| PORTFOLIOS ||| HELP

Copyright ©2007 Apex Learning Inc. All rights reserved. Patents D455,435 and D455,436.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Call Toll Free 1-800-453-6227 • Fax 206-381-5601

Beyond Books homepage